Morocco, officially the Kingdom of Morocco, is a country with over 33 million inhabitants, of which 99% are identified as Sunni Muslims, with a small number of Christians, Jews, Shiites, and Baha’is. Judaism is privileged over other religious minorities. Morocco is separated by only 14 km from its northern neighbour, Spain, by the Strait of Gibraltar. There are a variety of languages used throughout the country by varying ethnic groups, including Amazigh dialects, Arabic, Moroccan Arabic (Darija), Hassani (Saharan dialect), French and Spanish. A referendum on constitutional reforms was held in Morocco on 1 July 2011, in response to pro-democracy protests, and was approved by 98.49% of voters. Morocco is a member of the League of Arab States (LAS), as well as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
|Constitution and government||Education and children’s rights||Family, community, society, religious courts and tribunals||Freedom of expression advocacy of humanist values|
Government figures or state agencies openly marginalize, harass, or incite hatred or violence against the non-religious
The non-religious are barred from some government offices (including posts reserved for particular religions or sects)
Government authorities push a socially conservative, religiously or ideologically inspired agenda, without regard to the rights of those with progressive views
Countries: Barbados, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Central African Republic, Chile, Congo, Republic of the, Ecuador, Estonia, Fiji, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Mexico, Mongolia, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, South Africa, South Sudan, Taiwan, Ukraine
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brunei Darussalam, Comoros, Croatia, Egypt, Eritrea, Ghana, Iran, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Countries: Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Congo, Republic of the, Djibouti, Ecuador, France, Gabon, Honduras, Iceland, India, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Mali, Mexico, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, São Tomé and Príncipe, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan, United States of America, Uruguay
Countries: Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, Congo, Republic of the, Dominica, Ecuador, Estonia, France, Ghana, Guatemala, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Kosovo, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sweden, Taiwan, Uruguay, Venezuela
Countries: no countries relate to this boundary condition
Countries: no countries relate to this boundary condition
This condition is unusual in that it is applied in cases where there is some social discrimination, but it is not pervasive or nationwide. This condition is applied when there is sufficient background evidence to warrant the assertion that discrimination is not anomalous but widespread, and this condition may be applied for example even where if there is no legislative discrimination or where the non-religious may have legal recourse against such discrimination. However, societal discrimination (i.e. discrimination by peers, as opposed to state or legal discrimination) is not easily measured, and for this reason the Report does not currently have similar more severe boundary conditions to capture higher levels of social discrimination per se. In principle these may be introduced in future. However, we consider that countries with actual higher levels of social discrimination against the non-religious will generally already meet other higher level (more severe) boundary conditions under this thematic strand.
Applied when overriding acts of oppression by the State are extreme, to the extent that the question of freedom of thought and expression is almost redundant, because all human rights and freedoms are quashed by authorities.
Countries: North Korea
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Belize, Botswana, Brazil, Cambodia, Chile, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Latvia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malta, Moldova, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Togo, Tunisia, United Kingdom, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Countries: Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Belize, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Comoros, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Fiji, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Kosovo, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Micronesia, Mongolia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Samoa, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Switzerland, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, United Kingdom, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Countries: Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Central African Republic, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominica, Fiji, Finland, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Italy, Kiribati, Liechtenstein, Macedonia, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, New Zealand, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom, Vanuatu, Venezuela
Countries: Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brazil, Burundi, Central African Republic, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Guinea, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Libya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Oman, Philippines, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, Somalia, Sudan, Swaziland, Tajikistan, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Countries: Andorra, Armenia, Benin, Bhutan, Cambodia, Cameroon, Chad, Congo, Republic of the, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Macedonia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, Myanmar (Burma), Niger, Panama, Paraguay, Poland, Singapore, South Africa, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Turkey, Uganda
Countries: Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bangladesh, Belize, Bolivia, Botswana, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Georgia, Ghana, Greece, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, India, Ireland, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea, Republic of, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Vanuatu
This condition is applied where there are miscellaneous indicators that organs of the state offer various forms of support for a religion, or to religion in general over non-religious worldviews, suggesting a preference for those beliefs, or that the organs of that religion are privileged.
Countries: Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burundi, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Finland, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Montenegro, Mozambique, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Rwanda, San Marino, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, Tuvalu, United Kingdom, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Zimbabwe
Countries: Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Djibouti, Dominica, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Finland, Germany, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Kiribati, Korea, Republic of, Laos, Latvia, Liberia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Norway, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia, Singapore, Swaziland, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States of America, Vanuatu, Zimbabwe
This condition highlights countries where schools subject children to fundamentalist religious instruction with no real opportunity to question fundamentalist tenets, or where lessons routinely encourage hatred (for example religious or ethnic hatred). The wording “significant number of schools” is not given a rigid quantification (sometimes the worst-offending schools are unregistered, illegal, or otherwise uncounted); however the condition is not applied in cases where only a small number of schools meet the description and may be anomalous, as opposed to being indicative of a widespread problem.
Countries: Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nigeria, Oman, Palestine, Paraguay, Qatar, Russia, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Countries: Angola, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Congo, Republic of the, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ethiopia, Germany, Ghana, Haiti, Hungary, Italy, Jamaica, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritania, Mexico, Nepal, North Korea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Serbia, Singapore, Tajikistan, Tonga, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Zambia
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Finland, Georgia, Haiti, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritania, Monaco, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Tunisia, Tuvalu, United Kingdom, Yemen, Zambia
Countries: Argentina, Armenia, Belize, Burundi, Cambodia, Chad, China, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Guinea, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Jamaica, Jordan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Malaysia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Oman, Palestine, Peru, Philippines, Samoa, Swaziland, Switzerland, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Turkey, Uganda, United Kingdom, Zambia
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, China, Grenada, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Macedonia, Madagascar, Malaysia, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Bahamas, Bahrain, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Finland, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Haiti, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kiribati, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Moldova, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Nigeria, Oman, Philippines, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Tonga, Tunisia, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Comoros, Cyprus, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Grenada, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Singapore, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Denmark, Eritrea, Germany, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Rwanda, Solomon Islands, Switzerland, Tunisia, United Kingdom, Vanuatu
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belize, Brunei Darussalam, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Fiji, Gambia, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Macedonia, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
This condition may apply if specifically religious education, religious materials, or specific religious denominations are so tightly controlled that children are in fact over-protected from exposure to religion and are likely unable to explore or construct their own worldview in accordance with their evolving capacities. This condition helps us to classify states (perhaps with secular constitutions) which have criminalized specifically religious beliefs or practices. This condition is not applied if the restricted beliefs or practices are found to be outlawed due to their being of an extremist variety. While this condition does not directly reflect discrimination against non-religious persons or non-religious ideas, it does represent an overall threat to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief; such restrictions could spill over to affect non-religious beliefs later; and they pose a risk of backlash against over-zealous secular authorities or even against non-religious individuals by association.
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Bhutan, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, El Salvador, Finland, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius, Montenegro, Myanmar (Burma), Namibia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Following the public protests in 2011, King Mohammad VI introduced a number of legal reforms. The Constitutional reforms included the recognition of Amazigh language (a standardized version of the three main languages Tachelhit, Tamazight and Tarifit) as an official language along with Arabic and no longer referring to the king as “sacred”. The king’s integrity, however, remains “inviolable”. Women are guaranteed “civic and social” equality with men, while previously only political equality was guaranteed.
However, changes fell short of establishing real press freedom, democratic accountability, or an independent judiciary. Morocco detains at least 300 political prisoners. Opposing political and human rights associations’ right to assembly is regularly violated, their activities are censored. Artists and journalists, are investigated, harassed and jailed.
Although Morocco signed and ratified few UN treaties and resolutions on civil rights and freedom of religion, conscience and thought, such as the International covenant on International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and very recently the resolution on the freedom of religion or belief (A/HRC/25/L.19)1un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/HRC/25/L.19, their primacy over national laws is compromised: the preamble of the constitution stipulates that Morocco commits itself “To comply with the international conventions duly ratified by it” subject to their compatibility with the Constitution but also “its immutable national identity”.
The Constitution2https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Morocco_2011.pdf declares that “Islam is the religion of the State” (Article 3), and that Morocco “commits itself […] to deepen the bonds of togetherness with the Arabo-Islamic Ummah” (Preamble). It also refers to Islam, as well as monarchy, as one of the “federative constants” of the Nation (Article 1). The King is considered as a direct descendant of the prophet of Islam, which gives the ruling Alaouite dynasty its legitimacy. The Constitution (Article 41) designates the King as Commander of the Faithful, he is mandated to ensure the respect of Islam. He presides over the Superior Council of the “Ulemas” (religious scholars), which is the sole official instance entitled issue “religious consultations” (Fatwas).
While the new Constitution guarantees for all “the free exercise of beliefs” (Article 3) and “The freedoms of thought, of opinion and of expression under all their forms” (Article 25), in practice there are significant limitations, such as persecution of the Baha’is since the 1960s, and more recently Christians, and Shiites, as well as the non-religious. Baha’ism is traditionally seen as a heretical deviation from Islam and its members are considered “apostates”. These minorities are subject to harassment, investigations and detentions by authorities, interrupting and arresting them during their private religious meetings and rituals. The government allows foreign Christian communities to attend worship in approved places, but there are no Shia or Baha’i places of worship. Religious groups not belonging to the Maliki Law school or Judaism are required to register before taking any financial transactions as private associations. But the government does not recognize Baha’i or Shiite communities as registered religious organizations.
Following the approval of the National Council for Human Rights (CNDH) – the Moroccan official instance dedicated to human rights – adoption is only permitted for Muslims. The authorities argue that they have the right to ensure that adoptive children are raised in the Islamic faith.
Religious instruction according to the Sunnite Malikite Islam is compulsory in all national schools (Article 31), both public and private. All students pass an Islamic education test, among other subjects, to obtain their Baccalaureat. There are Quranic schools (Msid), where children are taught to learn the Quran by heart from an early age (4-5 years old), and are subject to corporal punishment, indoctrination, among other abuses. The government funds the teaching of Islam in all public schools and Judaism in some schools. Further, private Jewish schools are allowed to teach Judaism and Foreign-run schools can exclude religion from their school’s curriculum. The government further funds the study of Jewish culture at some universities.
Human Rights Education Associates (HREA) issued a study in 2005 on Human rights and Gender equality in Moroccan schoolbooks, and concluded that many school books favour and endorse gender inequality and propagate ideas that violate human rights.
Brother Rachid, a Moroccan Christian Convert dedicated an episode of his weekly show “Daring Questions” on the endorsement of Hate towards non-Muslims in school books, sitting an example of Islamic education’s book for the 1st primary education (generally 6-year-old children) which stipulates: “I love those who love the prophet Muhammad (PBUH), and I am hostile to those who are hostile towards him”, and the Baccalaureat school book that states that the punishment for apostasy is execution.3youtube.com/watch?v=UtxLJ5nAZ6Y
Activist and researcher at Moroccan Amazigh Cultural Institute (IRCAM), Ahmed Assid, spoke on Islam and education in Morocco, at a seminar organized by the Moroccan Association of Human Rights, and said that religious education in Morocco “is now outdated, and teaches religious values that contradict universal values of Human rights”. He added that the message of Islam taught to young people in school textbooks is “terroristic”. The religious education emphasizes values that go back to when Islam was “spread by the sword” during the time of prophet Mohamed. Assid said the education should emphasize that religious belief is a free choice of the individual and no one should be forced, intimidated or threatened to follow any belief: “How can you teach children with a message of ‘either become a muslim or be killed’? And this is being listed as one of the supreme values of our religion, highlighting prophet Mohamed giving newly conquered people the choice of Islam or Death. These values are negative and they are currently present in our education curriculum.” Assid said all the values taught at school should be compatible with today’s world human rights principles. As expected, Ahmed Assid speech has sparked controversy and a shower of criticism. The Salafist preacher Hassan El Kattani called for not “letting these remarks pass without reaction” and filed a complaint against Assid for “undermining Islam”.4moroccoboard.com/viewpoint-5/112-mostapha-saout/5852-morocco-extremist-values-in-religious-school-books
There are two family codes in Morocco, following the automatic state designation for citizens as Sunnite Malikite Muslims (Moudawana, reformed in 2004), or Jews (Hebraic Moroccan Family Law). There is no legal mechanism recognizing Christian or other non-Muslim communities. In consequence, all Moroccans, even if they are non-religious or belong to other belief groups, are forced to abide by those codes, and required to marry, divorce, and inherit according to their de facto religious designation.
The Moudawana permits sets the age of marriage at 18, but judges routinely allow girls below this age to marry. Interreligious marriage is prohibited; ”the marriage of a Muslim woman to a non-Muslim man, and the marriage of a Muslim man to a non-Muslim woman unless she is of the Christian or Jewish faith” (Article 39) and obliviously the religious – non religious marriage. In 2014 the controversial law (Article 475 of the Penal Code) allowing rapists escaping punishment by marrying their victim was removed. Abortion is strictly prohibited, including anyone who somehow facilitates it (Articles from 449 to 458). Polygyny is forbidden if “there is the risk of inequity between the wives” or “when the wife stipulates in the marriage contract that her husband will not take another wife.” (Article 40). Men have to petition the court to authorize it (Article 42). Women are discriminated in inheritance and divorce law. Marital rape remains legal.
The Moudawana includes Islamic concepts such as “kinship by breastfeeding” stating that “Impediments to marriage resulting from kinship by breastfeeding are the same as those prohibited through blood kinship and kinship by marriage. Only the breastfed child – not his or her brothers and sisters – is considered the child of the woman who breastfeeds him or her and of her husband” (Article 38).
According to Islamic law, women are not allowed to take the role of a preacher or imam, but the Ministry of Endowments and Islamic Affairs (MEIA) employs over 200 female Muslim spiritual guides (murshidat), who teach in religious topics, women’s legal rights issues, and family planning. However, women are not allowed to lead group prayers or to deliver Friday sermons in mosques.
Article 490 prohibits premarital heterosexual activities, and also used against unmarried couples living together. “Adultery” is illegal and punished with a prison sentence of up to two years (Article 491). Article 483 mandates a prison sentence of one month to two years for any act of “public obscenity”. In 2013, following a complaint from a “Human Rights” association, A 15-year-old boy and 14-year-old girl, along with a 15-year-old boy who took the picture, were arrested for posting a picture of them kissing on Facebook (the case is known as #NadorKiss), charged under this article and detained for three days.
In 2015 a movie called “Much loved” caused a big public debate, showing the live of Moroccan prostitutes and openly sexual scenes. Authorities first banned the movie from airing, later permitted it again and the feelings of the population were heated. Actress Loubna Abidar, who played a prostitute in the movie, was attacked by unknown knife-wielding assailants in Casablanca and stated that she was received with laughter at the police station. The actress and her director, Nabil Ayouch, were summoned to court in June on charges of “pornography, indecency and inciting minors to debauchery. Among the reactions on social media there was a Facebook page that called for the execution of the movie maker and the actress. Loubna Abidar left Morocco for security reasons.5theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/10/loubna-abidar-star-much-loved-morocco-sex-worker-film-flees-beating
In June 2015 two young women were harassed in a market in Inezgane for wearing skirts. Police arrested them and the girls prosecuted for indecency. However, the both were acquitted.6bbc.com/news/world-africa-33410759
The Moroccan Penal Code prohibits homosexuality and refers to it as “lewd or unnatural acts with an individual of the same sex” (Article 489). Homosexuals often face charges of prostitution, drunkenness and obscenity as well and several persons are jailed every year.
There were reports of public anti-Semitism, however, Jews and Muslims have a long history of relatively peaceful coexistence in Morocco and Jews serve in high-level government positions.
In general, there are no laws prohibiting religious clothing or the use of religious symbols in public or private sphere. However, some women stated, that some employers required them to remove their Hijab during working hours.
Article 29 of the Constitution guarantees “freedoms of reunion, of assembly, of peaceful demonstration, of association”, but states that the law establishes the conditions and modalities of its exercise.
Political parties are prohibited from criticising Islam, or the monarchy (Article 7). On the other side, the Constitution prohibits the foundation of political parties on religious, ethnic, linguistic, or regional bases. Some parties identified as “Islamically-oriented” rather than Islamist as the PJD (Party of Justice and Development) are permitted. MPs, while generally protected from prosecution in relation to their political activities, may “be prosecuted or investigated, arrested, detained or judged” if they express any opinion that “challenges the monarchic form of the State, the Muslim religion, or constitutes an infringement of the due respect of the king” (Article 64). This is also made explicit in Article 175 stating that no revision of the constitution may challenge the status and provisions of Islam, or monarchy.
The law regulating associations prohibits associations to criticise Islam, or monarchy (Article 3). In practice, authorities often refuse to receive the legal files for the establishment of associations. On July 22, the Administrative Judiciary Court turned down the lawsuit filed by the members of “Freedom Now” Association, alleging that the association doesn’t meet the “legal conditions” that grant it the right to litigation independently of its members.
The government monitors activities of mosques (including the content of preaching) and non-Muslim religious groups and places in some cases restrictions on members. For example, in February 2014 Salafi cleric Abu Naim was convicted of defamation and insulting a political figure for denouncing a prominent politician, secularists and the political left. He had pronounced takfir (accusing of apostasy) upon these persons.
There are no laws requiring the designation of religion on IDs or passports, and “apostasy” is not a crime under civil or criminal law.
However, there are several “blasphemy” laws bearing the threat of punishment for apostates. Jews can convert legally to Sunnite Malikite Islam, but conversion from Islam is discouraged by the state.
In 2013, the High Religious (Ulema) Council issued a fatwa asserting that any Muslim who abandons Islam should be executed, stipulating that the Islamic Law considers anyone born from Muslim parents, or a Muslim father, as a Muslim.
In 2017, the Council reversed this opinion, claiming instead that apostasy was akin to “treason” but should not be punishable by “death”.7moroccoworldnews.com/2017/02/207505/moroccos-high-religious-committee-says-apostates-should-not-be-killed/
Non-Muslims are prohibited by the Penal Code8https://www.refworld.org/docid/54294d164.html to proselytize and to “shake the faith” of Muslims (Article 220). Proselytizing can be punished with a sentence of 3 to 6 months’ imprisonment and a fine of 115 to 575 MAD. The distribution of non-Islamic religious materials is restricted by the government. Several individuals, for instance Christians, were arrested and accused of proselytizing. Some Christian converts reported that they were pressured by authorities to renounce their faith by informing their friends, relatives, and employers of the conversion.
Article 222 of the Penal Code states that “a person commonly known to be Muslim who violates the fast in a public place during Ramadan, without having one of the justifications allowed by Islam [such as travelling, sickness or menstruation], shall be punished by one to six months in prison,” as well as a fine. Several individuals are arrested and sentenced for eating, smoking or for consuming alcohol in Ramadan every year. Those laws remain, even if not strictly applied, a sword of Damocles on citizens and on civil rights, not least for the Moroccan non-religious community. The non-religious are, in fact, shaping up to be a prominent and vocal — and also seriously persecuted — belief group in Morocco, since the campaign against fasting laws in 2009, and the publication of a fatwa calling for the murder or execution of apostates. Suffering from stigmatization, activists reported many cases of violence by family members, investigation by authorities, and general difficulties in educational, professional and social life. They receive little support and mostly rejection from local human rights groups, usually refusing to grant assistance to legal cases of both non-religious and/or LGBTQ+ people, contrary to other religious minorities.
Chapter 267-5, in a supplementary amendment to Article 222, added in 2016, states the following:
“A prison sentence of six months to two years and a fine of 20,000 to 50,000 dirhams, or either of these two penalties, shall be imposed on anyone who offends:
“The Islamic religion or the monarchy, or incited against the territorial integrity of the Kingdom.
“The penalty increases to imprisonment from two to five years and a fine from 50,000 to 500,000 or either of these two penalties, if the acts referred to in the first paragraph above were committed by means of speeches, shouting, or threats made in public places and gatherings, or by posters presented to the public, or by sale or distribution, or by any means that fulfil the condition of publicity, including electronic, paper and audiovisual media.”
A 2002 law restricting media freedom prohibits expression deemed critical of “Islam, the institution of the monarchy, or territorial integrity.” Such expression may be punishable by imprisonment and includes members of the parliament. Further, any publication that criticises the monarchy, Islam and “sacred institutions” is prohibited under the article 179. This article is often used as a political weapon against journalists, activists and artists who criticise the government and its institutions.
Further, Moroccan television stations are required to dedicate 5 percent of their airtime to religious content and to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer five times daily.
In 2019, freedom of expression NGO, ARTICLE 19 condemned “the frequent attacks and trials against journalists, individuals and associations when they exercise their rights of freedom of expression, association and demonstration, in full contradiction with Morocco’s Constitution, laws and international commitments.”9https://www.article19.org/resources/morocco-human-rights-organizations-warn-against-increased-restrictions-on-freedom-of-expression-assembly-and-demonstration/
On 14 July 2020, the Court of First Instance and Appeals of Safi upheld the conviction and six-month prison sentence handed down to Mohammad Awatif Kachchach in connection with a caricature that he had posted on Facebook that was deemed to have insulted Islam under Article 267(5) of the Criminal Code.10https://end-blasphemy-laws.org/2020/07/moroccan-authorities-should-quash-the-conviction-of-man-charged-with-insulting-islam/
In May 2020, the Moroccan authorities arrested actor Rafik Boubker under Article 267(5) of the Criminal Code after he allegedly insulted Islam in a video clip widely shared on social media. He is currently thought to be on bail. Local media reported that the actor paid a fine of MAD 5,000 ($500).11https://english.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2020/5/27/moroccan-actor-arrested-for-mocking-islam
In May 2013, 22-year-old Imad Iddine Habib, a well-known atheist and founder of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Morocco received a number of death threats for his apostasy, and was harassed by authorities. He is now living abroad.12ex-muslim.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Apostasy_Report_Web1.pdf
Kacem El Ghazzali was a Moroccan atheist still at high school when he started an anonymous secularist blog in 2010. Critics tracked him down revealing his identity and threatening his life for “apostasy” and “blasphemy”. He then appeared the Arabic language version of the international news network France 24 to talk about his atheism. After the TV interview the principal of Gazzali’s school accused him of violating the law against “shaking the faith” of a Muslim and physically assaulted him. Other students at the school threw rocks at him. The imam in his village of Bouderbala denounced him from the pulpit, and his extended family stopped talking to him. After a period in hiding because of the threats to his life, Ghazzali was able to gain asylum in Switzerland. (Since living in Switzerland, Kacem El Ghazzali has since spoken as an invited delegate of the IHEU at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on a number of occasions.)13spiegel.de/international/world/moroccan-blogger-champions-freedom-in-swiss-exile-a-891561.html; iheu.org/why-must-i-be-killed-asks-moroccan-atheist/
In 2009, M.A.L.I. (Alternative Movement for Individual Liberties) held a picnic during the day of Ramadan to contest Article 222 of the penal code forbidding eating in public during Ramadan. The picnic was treated as a national emergency. The superior council of Ulemas said it was an insult to God. “King Mohammed VI’s political adviser persuaded all parties, including ones that routinely denounce Islamists, to issue condemnations for the sake of national unity. The activists were held and interrogated for several days, though ultimately not fined or taken to court. Police said they had to be protected from popular anger.”14economist.com/node/16793362
Since the picnic, dozens of cases of people are arrested every Ramadan for breaking fast in public are featured in local and International media, lawyers often refuse to defend such cases, which makes their status vulnerable in courts, as well as in prisons and society.
“I did come out as an atheist, my mother and sister know about it and they are understanding, my father on the other hand doesn’t know, not that be will be violent or something, it’s just I don’t want to start a boring argument with him. Many of my friends know about my atheism and they understand, I even had Muslim girlfriends who had no problem with me being an atheist. The Ramadan before the last, I ate at school, many classmates were shocked and stopped talking to me after that, others didn’t care.”