Sudan, once the largest country in Africa, has long suffered from severe ethnic strife and been plagued by internal conflict. The country gained independence from British-Egyptian rule in 1956. Wars between the predominantly Christian and animist south and the predominantly Muslim north eventually culminated in South Sudan’s independence in 2011.
Sudan’s long civil wars have given the country a poor human rights record and have led to large numbers of internal displacements within the country. The 2003-2020 war in the Darfur region saw the Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) rebel groups fighting government forces. It was followed by a government campaign of ethnic cleansing against Darfur’s non-Arab communities resulting in the deaths of an estimated 300,000 people.
At the time of writing, the country is caught up in another civil war between rival factions resulting in a devastating humanitarian crisis, and severe political and economic instability. As of early January 2026, the Sudan portal of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’s (UNHCR) reported 11.75 million people forcibly displaced since the conflict began in 2023 – including over seven million internally displaced. United Nations (UN) agencies estimate around 34 million are in need of humanitarian assistance while more than 21 million people are acutely food insecure.
Sudan’s population is predominantly Sunni Muslim. The Pew Research Center estimates that Muslims account for roughly 90% of the population and Christians make up around 5%. Followers of indigenous religions account for roughly 3%, with a small remainder made up of other faiths and religiously unaffiliated individuals. There is no specific indication of the number of non-religious people living in the country. Sudan is a member of the League of Arab States (LAS), as well as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
| Constitution and government |
Education and children’s rights |
Family, community, society, religious courts and tribunals |
Freedom of expression advocacy of humanist values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constitution and government
Education and children’s rights
Family, community, society, religious courts and tribunals
Freedom of expression advocacy of humanist values
The state is secular, with separation of religious and political authorities, not discriminating against any religion or belief
Countries: Belgium, Brazil, Central African Republic, Congo, Republic of the, Ecuador, Estonia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Japan, Kosovo, Mongolia, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, São Tomé and Príncipe, Slovenia, South Africa, South Sudan, Suriname, Taiwan, Ukraine
Insufficient information or detail not included in this report
Countries: no countries relate to this boundary condition
Religious or ideological instruction is mandatory in all or most state-funded schools with no secular or humanist alternative
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brunei Darussalam, Comoros, Croatia, Egypt, Eswatini, Ghana, Iran, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
No formal discrimination in education
Countries: Albania, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Congo, Republic of the, Czech Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras, Iceland, India, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Russia, São Tomé and Príncipe, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Uruguay
Insufficient information or detail not included in this report
Religious courts or tribunals rule directly on some family or ‘moral’ matters; it is legally an opt-in system, but the possibility of social coercion is very clear
Countries: Comoros, Ethiopia, Gambia, Jamaica, Kenya, Lebanon, Niger, Philippines, Senegal, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom
No religious tribunals of concern, secular groups operate freely, individuals are not persecuted by the state
Countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, Congo, Republic of the, Czech Republic, Dominica, Ecuador, Estonia, France, Ghana, Guatemala, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Kosovo, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mongolia, Namibia, Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, São Tomé and Príncipe, Slovenia, Sweden, Taiwan, Uruguay, Venezuela
Insufficient information or detail not included in this report
No fundamental restrictions on freedom of expression or advocacy of humanist values
Countries: Bahamas, Belgium, Czech Republic, Iceland, Jamaica, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden
Insufficient information or detail not included in this report
Countries: no countries relate to this boundary condition
No condition holds in this strand
No condition holds in this strand
No condition holds in this strand
No condition holds in this strand
Countries: no countries relate to this boundary condition
Localised or infrequent but recurring and widespread social marginalisation or prejudice against the non-religious
This condition is unusual in that it is applied in cases where there is some social discrimination, but it is not pervasive or nationwide. This condition is applied when there is sufficient background evidence to warrant the assertion that discrimination is not anomalous but widespread, and this condition may be applied for example even where if there is no legislative discrimination or where the non-religious may have legal recourse against such discrimination. However, societal discrimination (i.e. discrimination by peers, as opposed to state or legal discrimination) is not easily measured, and for this reason the Report does not currently have similar more severe boundary conditions to capture higher levels of social discrimination per se. In principle these may be introduced in future. However, we consider that countries with actual higher levels of social discrimination against the non-religious will generally already meet other higher level (more severe) boundary conditions under this thematic strand.
The dominant influence of religion in public life undermines the right to equality and/or non-discrimination
Applied when the influence of religion on public life undermines others' rights, such as SRHR, women's rights, LGBTI+ rights.
May be applied when the influence is overt (i.e. when religious laws are applied to undermine others' rights) or covert (i.e. where religious pressure groups exert influence to affect policy)
Countries: Albania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, Chile, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Eswatini, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Hungary, Iran, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Lithuania, Mali, Mexico, Moldova, Montenegro, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Oman, Panama, Paraguay, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Trinidad and Tobago, Ukraine, Zambia
Use of Conscientious Objection clauses resulting in the denial of lawful services to women and LGBTI+ people
Complete tyranny precludes all freedoms of expression and thought, religion or belief
Applied when overriding acts of oppression by the State are extreme, to the extent that the question of freedom of thought and expression is almost redundant, because all human rights and freedoms are quashed by authorities.
The non-religious are barred from some government offices (including posts reserved for particular religions or sects)
Countries: Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Comoros, Eritrea, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
There is systematic religious privilege
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Belize, Botswana, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malaysia, Malta, Moldova, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Togo, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States of America, Vanuatu, Zambia, Zimbabwe
There is a nominal state church with few privileges or progress is being made toward disestablishment
Religious or ideological indoctrination is utterly pervasive in schools
There is state funding of at least some religious schools
Countries: Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Belize, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Comoros, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Denmark, Dominica, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Grenada, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica, Kosovo, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Samoa, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Switzerland, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States of America, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe
State-funded schools offer religious or ideological instruction with no secular or humanist alternative, but it is optional
Countries: Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Italy, Kiribati, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Moldova, Monaco, New Zealand, Oman, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Senegal, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Tanzania, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom, Vanuatu, Venezuela
Expression of non-religious views is severely persecuted, or is rendered almost impossible by severe social stigma, or is highly likely to be met with hatred or violence
The non-religious are persecuted socially or there are prohibitive social taboos against atheism, humanism or secularism
Countries: Algeria, Bangladesh, Georgia, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Malaysia, Maldives, Nigeria, Oman, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Turkey
There is significant social marginalisation of the non-religious or stigma associated with expressing atheism, humanism or secularism
Countries: Barbados, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Malaysia, Malta, Poland, Samoa, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Uganda
Expression of core Humanist principles on democracy, freedom and human rights is brutally repressed
Countries: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Brunei Darussalam, Chad, China, Eritrea, Iran, Kuwait, Mauritania, Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
Expression of core humanist principles on democracy, freedom or human rights is severely restricted
Countries: Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brazil, Burundi, Central African Republic, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Cuba, Djibouti, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Oman, Philippines, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, Somalia, Tajikistan, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Expression of core humanist principles on democracy, freedom or human rights is somewhat restricted
Countries: Andorra, Armenia, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Congo, Republic of the, Côte d'Ivoire, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Israel, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mexico, Mozambique, Niger, Paraguay, Poland, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, South Africa, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Turkey, Tuvalu, Uganda, United States of America
Some concerns about political or media freedoms, not specific to the non-religious
Countries: Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Austria, Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Denmark, Dominica, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, France, Gambia, Ghana, Greece, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, India, Ireland, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Korea, Republic of, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Viet Nam, Zambia
Religious authorities have supreme authority over the state
State legislation is partly derived from religious law or by religious authorities
Countries: Algeria, Bangladesh, Comoros, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Malaysia, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates
Preferential treatment is given to a religion or religion in general
This condition is applied where there are miscellaneous indicators that organs of the state offer various forms of support for a religion, or to religion in general over non-religious worldviews, suggesting a preference for those beliefs, or that the organs of that religion are privileged.
Countries: Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burundi, Canada, Cape Verde, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Montenegro, Mozambique, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Oman, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Rwanda, San Marino, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Tunisia, Turkey, Tuvalu, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Zimbabwe
Official symbolic deference to religion
Countries: Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Croatia, Cyprus, Djibouti, Dominica, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Finland, Germany, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea, Republic of, Laos, Latvia, Liberia, Malawi, Malaysia, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Serbia, Singapore, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States of America, Vanuatu, Zimbabwe
Religious or ideological instruction in a significant number of schools is of a coercive fundamentalist or extremist variety
This condition highlights countries where schools subject children to fundamentalist religious instruction with no real opportunity to question fundamentalist tenets, or where lessons routinely encourage hatred (for example religious or ethnic hatred). The wording "significant number of schools" is not given a rigid quantification (sometimes the worst-offending schools are unregistered, illegal, or otherwise uncounted); however the condition is not applied in cases where only a small number of schools meet the description and may be anomalous, as opposed to being indicative of a widespread problem.
Religious schools have powers to discriminate in admissions or employment
Countries: Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Equatorial Guinea, Finland, Germany, Haiti, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Jamaica, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Sri Lanka, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States of America, Zimbabwe
State-funded schools provide religious education which may be nominally comprehensive but is substantively biased or borderline confessional
There is a pattern of impunity or collusion in violence by non-state actors against the non-religious
Systemic religious privilege results in significant social discrimination
Countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ghana, Guinea, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Oman, Palestine, Paraguay, Qatar, Russia, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Some religious courts rule in civil or family matters on a coercive or discriminatory basis
Countries: Comoros, Egypt, Haiti, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malaysia, Nigeria, Palestine, Philippines, Singapore, Turkey
‘Apostasy’ or conversion from a specific religion is outlawed and punishable by death
Countries: Afghanistan, Brunei Darussalam, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Yemen
‘Apostasy’ is outlawed and punishable with a prison sentence
Blasphemy or criticism of religion is restricted in law and is punishable by a fine
Countries: Australia, Austria, Barbados, Brazil, Cambodia, Finland, Italy, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Moldova, Montenegro, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Saint Lucia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Kingdom
Concerns that secular or religious authorities interfere in specifically religious freedoms
Countries: Angola, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cameroon, China, Congo, Republic of the, Denmark, Ethiopia, Germany, Ghana, Haiti, Hungary, Italy, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritania, Mexico, Nepal, North Korea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Singapore, Tajikistan, Tonga, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, Venezuela, Viet Nam
State legislation is largely or entirely derived from religious law or by religious authorities
Countries: Afghanistan, Bahrain, Brunei Darussalam, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Maldives, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
There is an established church or state religion
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Finland, Georgia, Haiti, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritania, Monaco, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Tuvalu, United Kingdom, Yemen, Zambia
Anomalous discrimination by local or provincial authorities, or overseas territories
Countries: Cameroon, Dominica, Ethiopia, France, Ghana, Guinea, India, Jamaica, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico, Micronesia, Mongolia, Niger, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Switzerland, Thailand, Tonga, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uruguay
Religious or ideological instruction is mandatory in at least some public schools (without secular or humanist alternatives)
Countries: Argentina, Armenia, Belize, Cambodia, Chad, China, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Germany, Guinea, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Jamaica, Jordan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Lesotho, Libya, Malawi, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Palestine, Peru, Philippines, Samoa, Switzerland, Thailand, Uganda, United Kingdom
Government figures or state agencies openly marginalize, harass, or incite hatred or violence against the non-religious
Countries: Afghanistan, Egypt, Hungary, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan
Government authorities push a socially conservative, religiously or ideologically inspired agenda, without regard to the rights of those with progressive views
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, China, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Malaysia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Russia, Saint Lucia, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zimbabwe
Discriminatory prominence is given to religious bodies, traditions or leaders
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Grenada, Haiti, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kiribati, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Micronesia, Moldova, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Nigeria, Oman, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Qatar, Romania, Samoa, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Tonga, Tunisia, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
‘Blasphemy’ or criticism of religion is outlawed and punishable by death
‘Blasphemy’ is outlawed or criticism of religion (including de facto ‘blasphemy’ laws) is restricted and punishable with a prison sentence
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Comoros, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Finland, Gambia, Germany, Grenada, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Oman, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Quasi-divine veneration of a ruling elite is enforced, or a single-party regime holds uncontested power, subject to severe punishment
Legal or constitutional provisions exclude non-religious views from freedom of religion or belief
Countries: Argentina, Burundi, Canada, Eritrea, Haiti, Jordan, Lebanon, Madagascar, Malaysia, Morocco, Oman, Philippines, Qatar, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Tonga
It is illegal to register an explicitly Humanist, atheist, secularist or other non-religious NGO or other human rights organization, or such groups are persecuted by authorities
Countries: Afghanistan, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Kuwait, Maldives, Morocco, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
Prohibitive interreligious social control (including interreligious marriage bans)
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Djibouti, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Myanmar (Burma), Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
Religious groups control some public or social services
Countries: Algeria, Argentina, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Denmark, Germany, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malawi, Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Solomon Islands, Switzerland, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States of America
It is illegal to advocate secularism or church-state separation, or such advocacy is suppressed
Countries: Afghanistan, Brunei Darussalam, Comoros, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Maldives, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
The non-religious are barred from holding government office
There is a religious tax or tithing which is compulsory, or which is state-administered and discriminates by precluding non-religious groups
Countries: Argentina, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ghana, Haiti, Hungary, Italy, Pakistan, Peru, Rwanda, Samoa, Sweden, Switzerland
Religious control over family law or legislation on moral matters
Countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belize, Brunei Darussalam, Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
It is illegal or unrecognised to identify as an atheist or as non-religious
Countries: Comoros, Egypt, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Maldives, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, United Arab Emirates
Some concerns about children's right to specifically freedom of religion or belief
This condition may apply if specifically religious education, religious materials, or specific religious denominations are so tightly controlled that children are in fact over-protected from exposure to religion and are likely unable to explore or construct their own worldview in accordance with their evolving capacities. This condition helps us to classify states (perhaps with secular constitutions) which have criminalized specifically religious beliefs or practices. This condition is not applied if the restricted beliefs or practices are found to be outlawed due to their being of an extremist variety. While this condition does not directly reflect discrimination against non-religious persons or non-religious ideas, it does represent an overall threat to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief; such restrictions could spill over to affect non-religious beliefs later; and they pose a risk of backlash against over-zealous secular authorities or even against non-religious individuals by association.
Countries: China, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Cuba, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Guyana, Italy, Kazakhstan, Laos, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mali, Mexico, North Macedonia, Romania, Tajikistan, Togo, Turkmenistan, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe
State-funding of religious institutions or salaries, or discriminatory tax exemptions
Countries: Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bhutan, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Eswatini, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guinea, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius, Montenegro, Myanmar (Burma), Namibia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Suriname, Switzerland, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uruguay, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Yemen, Zimbabwe
It is made difficult to register or operate an explicitly Humanist, atheist, secularist or other non-religious NGO or other human rights organization
Countries: Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of, Egypt, Eritrea, Georgia, Malaysia, Mauritania, Nigeria, Pakistan, Palestine, Senegal, Somalia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan
| Grave Violations |
| Severe Discrimination |
Constitution and government
Political situation
President Omar al-Bashir, who came to power through a military coup d’état in 1989, was ousted in 2019 following months of civilian protests against his rule. He was convicted of corruption charges by a Sudanese court and is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) to stand trial for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes over Sudan’s military campaign in Darfur. In September 2024, due to his health deterioration, al-Bashir was transferred to a medical facility in northern Sudan after being held in a military facility since the war broke out in April 2023.
After the overthrow of former president al-Bashir, Sudan embarked on a political transition aimed at dismantling some of the hardline Islamist policies through democratic civilian rule. As part of a power-sharing deal between the ruling Transitional Military Council (TMC) and the opposition Forces for Freedom and Change (FFC) coalition, an 11-member sovereign council composed of six civilians and five military officers was appointed to govern the country for a three-year transition period (until 2022). However, in October 2021, the commander of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, seized power, dissolving the transitional government and arresting civilian leaders. The move led to nationwide protests and international condemnation. In April 2023, fighting erupted between the SAF and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), notorious for their role in the ethnic cleansing of non-Arab civilians in Darfur. The fighting between the two factions resulted in mass killing and reports of ethnic-based atrocities.
As of January 2026, Sudan remains embroiled in civil war, with mass displacement continuing and famine conditions reported in multiple locations. The SAF, under Gen. al-Burhan, has retaken key positions in Khartoum (including the Presidential Palace in March 2025) and fierce fighting continues despite the resumption of peace talks in January 2026 and calls for a nationwide humanitarian truce.
Progress stalled
After al-Bashir was ousted, Abdalla Hamdok was sworn in as prime minister in August 2019 and became the head of the transitional government. During this period, the transitional authorities began dismantling key elements of the former Islamist legal framework. A raft of legal amendments were passed in July 2020 in order to bring the country’s laws in line with a 2019 interim constitutional declaration. These included amendments to abolish the crime of apostasy; to end the death penalty and flogging for same-sex relationships (but keeping a possible sentence of prison terms ranging from five years to life); to permit children to travel with their mothers without permission from male members of their family; to ban female genital mutilation (FGM); to repeal some laws restricting women’s dress; and to allow consumption of alcohol for non-Muslims.
These reforms rested on the interim constitutional declaration signed by the TMC and the FFC (the “2019 Declaration”). The 2019 Declaration contains provisions protecting the right to freedom of religion or belief (framed in the text as operating “in accordance with the requirements of the law and public order”). It repeals the Transitional Constitution of 2005 and the constitutions of all Sudanese provinces. However, laws promulgated pursuant to the 2005 Constitution will remain in effect until such time as they are abolished or new laws are passed repealing them.
The reform agenda proved politically polarizing. While many in Sudan celebrated the changes, loyalists of al-Bashir and Sudan’s Islamic parties, including the Popular Congress Party (PCP), denounced them. The famous Sudanese cleric Abdul Hai Youssef called for “jihad” against Prime Minister Hamdok’s government, stating that “bringing down this government, which has legalized apostasy and other wrongdoings, is a duty for any Muslim.” In March 2020, an unsuccessful assassination attempt was carried out against Prime Minister Hamdok, who was widely seen to be leading the reforms. In September 2020, the transitional government signed a declaration adopting the principle of secularism, stating that:
“[f]or Sudan to become a democratic country where the rights of all citizens are enshrined, the constitution should be based on the principle of ‘separation of religion and state,’ in the absence of which the right to self-determination must be respected.”
Progress stalled following the October 2021 coup d’état led by Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, which placed Sudan under military control and limited civilian governance. Although Prime Minister Hamdok was reinstated in November of the same year, he resigned in January 2022. A Framework Political Agreement drafted at the end of 2022 reiterated a pledge to protect freedom of religion and belief, but subsequent instability – and then war – left many reforms and commitments unimplemented.
In May 2025, Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan appointed Kamil Idris as prime minister, the first since the civil war began. Prime Minister Idris was tasked with forming a new transitional government. International observers, including the UN Secretary-General, expressed hope that the appointment of a civilian prime minister could be a first step toward peace.
In February 2025, the RSF and allied political and armed groups signed a charter for the creation of a parallel government which called for a secular, decentralized Sudan and a ban on religious political parties. In late July 2025, the parallel government was announced, raising fears of further partition within the country.
Registration of religious groups
Formal recognition of religious groups is primarily overseen by the Ministry of Religious Affairs (MRA). The MRA also plays a wider administrative role in religious affairs, including oversight of Islamic institutions and engagement with churches and other communities.
A religious group’s ability to run humanitarian assistance programs often depends on registration with the Humanitarian Aid Commission (HAC). Registration can determine access to benefits such as tax exemptions and ownership of land.
Education and children’s rights
All schools in Sudan are required to provide Islamic education classes to Muslim students as part of the national curriculum, and attendance is mandatory for those students. Non-Muslim students are formally exempt from Islamic education classes. However, in practice, implementation varies and there have been reports that some Christian students have been required to attend Islamic classes. As all students must receive religious education, students of minority religions are typically educated outside the formal school setting, and there are no secular alternatives that allow students to opt out of religious instruction altogether. Christian instruction in public schools should be available when there are at least 15 Christian students in a class, and the government had planned to increase the number of Christian teachers before the proposal was disrupted by the 2021 coup d’état and the ensuing conflict.
In January 2020, the Ministry of Education had also announced that pre-school students would no longer be required to learn the Quran in school. The transitional government also suspended a law that required Christian schools to conduct classes on Sundays.
Given the current political instability in the country, it is unclear how far the letter of the law is applied in practice.
Child Marriage
Sudan’s 1991 Muslim Personal Status Act permits marriage for girls as young as ten, and child marriage remains widespread. It is estimated that a third of the female population between 20-24 is married before the age of 18. A report published by UNICEF in 2017, found that many religious leaders believe that child marriage is part of Islamic principles and are therefore resistant to change. However, the report also points to examples of receptive religious leaders in the country, including a religious scholar who calculated that the Prophet Mohammed married his wife when she was 17 or 18 years old, and not nine years old as is frequently claimed.
Family, community and society
The Criminal Code states that the law shall be based on Sharia sources and include hudud, qisas, and diyah principles (regarding punishment, restitution, and compensation for specific serious crimes). Many laws concerning personal and family matters adopted during the al-Bashir administration remain largely in effect and continue to be based on Sharia law. Interpretation of Sharia-based law draws on various schools of jurisprudence (madhahib). A Panel of Islamic Scholars and Preachers (the Fiqh Council) has been responsible for explaining and interpreting the laws and indicating which approaches may be applied in practice. Since the ousting of al-Bashir, the scope of the Fiqh Council’s mandate has remained uncertain.
Discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities
Under al-Bashir’s government, Christians in Sudan were persecuted and churches were forcibly shut down or destroyed, often under the pretext that they lacked proper building permits. In November 2025, two Christian churches in the city of Port Sudan were graffitied with Islamic phrases written in red paint. They were among the oldest churches in the country and, despite being located opposite a police station and the perpetrators being caught on CCTV, the police took no action.
In September 2019, Prime Minister Hamdok stated that his administration would address “religious discrimination,” and the Minister of Religion invited Jews and Christians who had left the country to return. However, religious discrimination remains prevalent in Sudan, as many laws concerning personal and family affairs adopted during al-Bashir’s rule largely remain in effect. This can result in different legal outcomes depending on the perpetrator’s religion. For example, while Muslim men are allowed to marry Christian or Jewish women, Muslim women generally may not marry a non-Muslim man. Differences have also been reported in how certain offences are enforced – for instance, alcohol-related penalties have not always been applied uniformly across religious groups. The Criminal Code sets out that Muslims that possess or consume alcohol are subject to lashes as punishment, while non-Muslims are typically not. The law also provides a discretionary mechanism for early release if an inmate memorizes the Quran during imprisonment.
In December 2019, the transitional government declared Christmas a national holiday, and court proceedings were initiated to return land confiscated by the previous regime back to Christian communities.
Despite the 2020 agreements, and even before war broke out in 2023, incidents of ethnic violence across the country were rife. Hundreds of people died and hundreds of thousands were displaced during conflicts between tribes in the Blue Nile, Kordofan, and Darfur areas. Government responses sometimes worsened the humanitarian situation, with arbitrary detentions and abductions by security forces.
According to Freedom House:
“Since the start of the 2023 war, the RSF and allied militias have carried out brutal attacks on non-Arab populations in Darfur, particularly the Massalit, in an attempt to expel those groups from certain areas, such as the city of El-Geneina. Reports indicated that more than 10,000 people had been killed by late 2023, while hundreds of thousands fled the region. Sexual violence against women and girls in Darfur was pervasive. The RSF also reportedly burned neighborhoods, health clinics, and humanitarian aid offices, preventing survivors of the attacks from accessing help. Violence against civilians based on their ethnic origin intensified in October, when the RSF started gaining more territory in the region, and continued through year’s end.”
Since the current civil war began, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has documented a deterioration in conditions for religious minorities, including reports of arbitrary detention and incidents involving attacks on places of worship. The impact of the war on places of worship has not been confined to one religious group. The UN’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for Sudan found that there have been a series of attacks on religious sites, including the bombing of churches and mosques. In September 2025, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) carried out a drone strike on the Al-Safiya Mosque in north Darfur killing at least 75 worshippers during morning prayers.
There is little information available on the experience of atheists in Sudan, however some accounts describe severe social stigma and threats of violent attack. This would be consistent with violence faced by other minority belief groups detailed above.
Women’s Rights
Women were fundamental to the protests that contributed to the 2019 ousting of former President al-Bashir whose regime had severely suppressed women’s rights. The current conflict has, however, halted the progress that was starting to be seen in a country where leaders have long used religious laws to exert control over women. In what is an extremely patriarchal society, women are again the victims of further waves of violence and brutality including extremely high levels of sexual violence and exploitation.
Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
Despite Sudan’s legal ban on FGM in 2020, women and girls remain highly vulnerable to the practice, and even more so in the context of conflict, displacement and humanitarian crisis.
According to the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), almost 89% of women in Sudan have undergone FGM, although support for the practice is slowly starting to decline. Reasons given by women to justify the continuation of the practice were, “cleanliness (purity), social acceptance, better marriage prospects, chastity, and sexual attraction to male partners”.
Religious leaders have shown a varied response to initiatives seeking to abolish the practice. A report from the Women’s Studies International Forum publication argues that gaining support from religious leaders on this issue has depended on the composition of their power base and their inclusion in or exclusion from the process.
LGBTI+ Rights
Same-sex sexual activity is illegal in Sudan and currently carries a penalty of five years imprisonment, which can extend to life imprisonment in the case of a third conviction. The possibility of capital or corporal punishment was removed when the Penal Code was amended in 2020.
LGBTI+ individuals face serious threats of harassment or attack in a highly conservative and religious society that remains overwhelmingly opposed to LGBTI+ rights.
Freedom of expression, advocacy of humanist values
Media freedoms
Media freedoms were heavily restricted during al-Bashir’s rule, characterized by institutionalized censorship, mass arrests of journalists, and raids on newspapers and printing presses. While there were improvements under the new 2019 government, Reporters Without Borders reported that, while the government had committed to freedom of expression, censorship was exercised more discreetly. Most political newspapers continue to be affiliated with supporters of the former regime.
A number of laws have been used to target and silence critics and independent media. The Press and Publications Act 2009 and the National Security Act 2010 remain in effect, while the draconian Cybercrime Act 2007 has been replaced with the vaguely worded Law on Combating Cybercrimes (LCC) 2018, which rights groups describe as vague and repressive. In January 2026, Sudanese activist Ayman Hariri was handed a fine of two million Sudanese pounds and sentenced to six months in prison under Sudan’s cybercrimes law. He had criticized the security services’ use of a building on social media that had previously been used to provide emergency care and shelter those displaced by the conflict. Reporters Without Borders found that the 2021 military coup d’état reinstated censorship and, since the start of the 2023 conflict, attacks on journalists have surged, forcing many to flee abroad.
Today, state-controlled media dominates Sudan’s information landscape, typically serving as mouthpieces for the government. Since the 2021 coup d’état, repression has intensified with journalist arrests, internet shutdowns, and military propaganda. The civil war has further crippled the media, forcing many outlets to close. Communications – and particularly internet access – has frequently been affected during the conflict, with disruptions impacting the ability of emergency services to operate and humanitarian organizations to provide relief. Interviews with human rights defenders by Amnesty International revealed that they were “unable to carry out meaningful documentation of rights violations” due to internet blackouts.
Sudan’s multicultural society faces growing intolerance, with rising ethnic tensions and media scrutiny. Religious groups influence journalism, while social media – once a platform for free expression – now fuels racism and misogyny, often targeting women and minorities. Journalists in Sudan face growing threats of arrest and torture from militias, the army, and the RSF. Women journalists are the most targeted.
“Apostasy” and “blasphemy”
During al-Bashir’s reign there were many high-profile cases of apostasy. In July 2020, apostasy was decriminalized, and replaced by a new provision prohibiting the labeling of any group of individuals as “infidels.”
In July 2022, four Christian men in Darfur were accused of “apostasy” following a church raid, even though the law against converting from Islam had been abolished. After reportedly being subjected to police harassment and inhumane and degrading treatment, as well as a legal ordeal, the General Prosecutor in Central Darfur dismissed the case in September of the same year.
“Blasphemy” remains a criminal offense; however, the provision has been amended. Prior to the amendment, Article 125 of the Penal Code stated:
“Whoever, by any means, publicly abuses or insults any of the religions, rites, or beliefs, or sanctities, or seeks to excite feelings of contempt and disrespect against the believers thereof, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or with a fine, or with whipping, which may not exceed forty lashes.”
The new law abolishes the penalty of whipping, and the period of imprisonment is limited to six months. In November 2024, reports indicated that many Christians were still serving long jail terms related to blasphemy charges, despite the 2020 legal changes.
Freedom of Assembly
After 2019, the transitional government eased restrictions on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) making it possible for them to register. In light of the ongoing conflict and subsequent obstacles to registration faced by many NGOs, the Humanitarian Aid Commission issued a decree that extended the validity of expired registrations to March 2024. Reports indicate that there has been an increasing level of attacks on human rights groups and women human rights defenders in particular since the start of the current hostilities.
Anti-government protests, which began in December 2018, were violently suppressed by state security forces, who attacked protesters wherever they congregated, including outside mosques, hospitals, and schools. Serious violations reported during the protests include the use of torture and other inhuman, degrading treatment; sexual and gender-based violence; and attempts by the state to limit information about events on the ground by shutting down the internet and communications networks. While the transitional government committed to holding those responsible for the violence to account, it failed to release the findings from its investigation and bring charges against officials. Human Rights Watch found that at least 120 people had been killed and more than 900 injured between 3-18 June 2019, while Sudanese officials estimated that at least 64 women were raped and others sexually assaulted.
In 2022, security forces violently suppressed protests, killing and injuring protesters, and blocking roads and bridges to prevent gatherings in key locations. Throughout 2023, the Sudanese government, SAF, RSF, and allied militias were responsible for numerous extrajudicial killings. In February, security forces killed a 16-year-old protester with a police officer indicted for murder.